BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:30:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <2f365fb32d914ec4bda51d8c34a4b2cb@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <20140911113221.GE13278@randomstring.org> <2f365fb32d914ec4bda51d8c34a4b2cb@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:06:33PM +0000, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: > > From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss- > > bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Dan Ritter > > > > . Monoculture is bad > > > > . systemd does not play well with others > > > > . systemd advocates act as if There Can Only Be One and so they > > must win at any cost > > I see how it is. Because I like systemd, you're saying I'm a bad guy. ;-) How ironic. Nope. I'm telling you that I perceive systemd "guys" as being arrogant, hubristic, and competitive instead of cooperative... and now I'll tell you that you're not doing anything to change that. -dsr-
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):