BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:35:40 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20150710191548.GA20086@SDF.ORG>
- References: <20150703203041.9CCE7E2035@mail2.ihtfp.org> <5598038F.9070408@gmail.com> <sjm8uarevhe.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <559FED8A.9010407@borg.org> <559FF473.7010405@gmail.com> <559FFD2E.6090901@borg.org> <55A0006A.6090201@gmail.com> <CAFq0N1wX6gdtrc7DUQBnAzHKFrS7LrP+AmiP7zb_w8UahBx58g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFv2jcZbtVyVG+bB2qa7b9LDENWASL8J7AbJEoTT11db0bfQUg@mail.gmail.com> <20150710191548.GA20086@SDF.ORG>
On 07/10/2015 03:15 PM, Mike Small wrote: > I guess my point is people shouldn't be slavish to that advice. It > would be good if there were some to take up the detritus from those > companies and enthusiasts who are churning through all this junk > every couple years. Oh, and it would be nice if people would be a > little less paranoid and not figure harddrives need to have holes > drilled through them before turning them loose (not meaning to > dredge up that debate again). I don't have an electron scanning > microscope, scout's honour. Most of the people who do the drilling ( I admit, I drilled hundreds of drives) will actually agree with you. I agree with you 100% myself. The data destruction is usually mandated by the institution/organization/company. And, no, unfortunately, you can't convince them otherwise by technical arguments. If I had my own large company, I will overwrite the entire drive with /dev/urandom and hand it to whoever wants it. -- F. Ozbek
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: jack at coats.org (Jack Coats)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):