BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Subject: [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:37:26 -0700
- In-reply-to: <BLUPR04MB36972B5A03F757B21DB0BD1DC430@BLUPR04MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <35477f1758505bbd4e4be8f908a2e8f2.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <CAOTD2YSL0xAH_=GHdiddogP5A5v29FYDt-Mwxsv-UxaToyZZhw@mail.gmail.com> <BLUPR04MB3694520EDC349C5692CF202DC430@BLUPR04MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAOTD2YQjqTiD2VxnKseXJGhUoHvm5nBo2-6P7XdjV_fp69KmnA@mail.gmail.com> <BLUPR04MB369BF0FB77FDFC8D4B9E0C1DC430@BLUPR04MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAOTD2YR=DDdhgWXoSZnmPZV7D6x5dR4x3RtOx=H3uLLJxqBNKg@mail.gmail.com> <d23fd925c1f7caf7652e65e7aa441cbc.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <20150924180938.GF4290@randomstring.org> <BLUPR04MB36972B5A03F757B21DB0BD1DC430@BLUPR04MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Edward Net Harvey questions SpiderOak: > I personally feel it's deceptive marketing > "... When accessing your data via the SpiderOak website or a > mobile device, you must enter your password which will then exist in the > SpiderOak server memory for the duration of your browsing session." I'm actually OK with that one; the above sentence is taken a bit out of context in that it's describing a particular feature that few of us would actually ever use. This "Instant Access From Anywhere" feature allows you to log into their site, "access your data remotely", and decrypt it on their back-end. This is not something I'd ever really expect a backup-software vendor to enable me to do, and it's not something I'd find myself wanting to do. My use-case will always be to download the encrypted bits and perform decryption upon restore, using my private keys (not a passphrase). The vendor then goes on to say use of this feature "represents the only situation where your data could potentially be readable to someone [else besides you]". That's a strong claim and their lawyers would have to be pretty darned confident before allowing publication: if any breach ever happens, then they basically lose their franchise. Seems pretty assuring to me. -rich
- References:
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Cloud-backup solutions for Linux?
- Index(es):