BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] systemd explanations
- Subject: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:22:01 -0500
- In-reply-to: <56C77C65.80305@gmail.com>
- References: <56C53172.2010709@riseup.net> <chxmvqyeztx.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org> <20160218123628.1f963b58@mydesk.domain.cxm> <56C60772.7040309@gmail.com> <20160219004630.44668069@mydesk.domain.cxm> <56C73BDA.2000800@gmail.com> <201602191704.u1JH427l017094@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <56C74D03.7000708@gmail.com> <201602191822.u1JIM8DY017494@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <56C76A9C.6000308@gmail.com> <201602191927.u1JJR8xb017853@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <56C77716.6060700@gmail.com> <201602192018.u1JKIjBp018153@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <56C77C65.80305@gmail.com>
On 02/19/16 15:34, Rich Pieri wrote: > On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: >>> Because what they say is cruel and uncalled-for. >> >> But if they're that irrelevant, what difference does it make? >> >>> Back at you: how does forking the code get them to stop being cruel? >> >> Again: if they're rendered completely irrelevant, why does it matter >> if their words are cruel and uncalled-for? > > If you cannot figure this out for yourself then you are the problem. > Either they're irrelevant or they aren't? In my view they are irrelevant. Like how I feel about celebrities -- it's a decision you make. And perhaps if that perspective becomes contagious, then it will be solved. There's plenty of other people working toward the same goals. But it won't be solved by continuing to give them attention, right?
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- References:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Index(es):