BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- Subject: [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:40:51 -0500
- In-reply-to: <a64a4ee1e1fec74222553bd085b0ce74.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
- References: <a64a4ee1e1fec74222553bd085b0ce74.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
markw at mohawksoft.com said on Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:16:28 -0500 >I guess the question is this: Can we help non-nerds be Linux users? As >a "user's group" shouldn't we help generate new users? Historically >speaking, I don't think there has ever been more user friendly linux >distros and better interoperability and usability. When you say non-nerds, I'm assuming you mean technophobes who take it as a matter of faith that they can't use an editor, can't modify a config file, can't write a simple shellscript, can't issue a command on the command line, and are proud of these facts. The type who proudly exclaims "I am not a programmer" when talk turns to using a text editor. They're proud of their ignorance, and refuse to learn. Assuming that, to answer your question about whether we can help them be Linux users... We can. But we shouldn't. For the past 25 years, recruiting these "non-nerd" users has been the excuse for making Linux ever more complexificated, to the point where interchangeable parts, the step up that led to the Industrial Revolution, is now very difficult in Linux. POSIX? Poettering himself said POSIX is no good. Do one thing and do it well? That's soooooo 1999. But let me tell you what's *really* 1999: Seeking the triumph of the Linux desktop. I was there in those heady days when Linux was a revolution, not an OS. We were going to displace Windows and Mac. And you know what? On the server we succeeded. On the desktop? Not even close. If we haven't "won" on the desktop in 25 years, it's doubtful we ever will. And that's just fine with me. Desktop Windows serves a purpose in the Linux ecosystem. It keeps the lazy, "I refuse to learn simple shellscripts" people off our mailing lists, so our computing lives don't get watered down. Linux is the place for people who want to boss their computers, not for people who want their computers to boss them. Please listen closely to the following distinction: The preceding several paragraphs were about people who are proudly ignorant of editors, command line, config files and simple shellscripts. Windows users who want to have more control over their computing environment, and are eager to use editors, command line, config files and simple shellscripts, should be welcomed with open arms, and given an assist until they come up to our level of Linux use and knowledge. >Can anyone imagine a Windows 10 user actually converting to Linux? Absolutely. I quit win98 to move to Linux. Plenty of others are like me. There are a hell of a lot of reasons to hate Windows, and Linux dispenses with almost all of those reasons. But here again, the distinction: They needn't come to us until they're dam sick of Windows "my way or the highway" workflow. If they're happy with Windows, they have no business using Linux. SteveT Steve Litt http://444domains.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- From: admin at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- From: admin at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- References:
- [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, February 19, 2025 - Inkscape: A Free and Open Source Vector Graphics Editor
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Community out-reach... convert the masses?
- Index(es):