choosing base addresses on NICs

[pfarrar at learningco.com (pfarrar at learningco.com)]

     So it sounds like I don't need to consider the interupt when choosing 
     a base address - that they are independent of one another.  Is that 
     correct?


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: choosing base addresses on NICs
Author:  "Feldman; Gerry" <Gerry.Feldman at compaq.com> at InterNet
Date:    12/27/99 1:25 PM


First, the 9(?) pin port is called AUI. This is the original Ethernet. The 
coax is called a BNC connector. The RJ45 connector is 10baseT. The base 
address, as you guessed is the i/o port address. It is important in PC 
architecture that each device have its own IRQ and its own I/O port base 
address. The PC was not designed for the type of work it is doing now, so 
these tend to be severe limitations. Theoretically, it is possible for 
multiple devices to share the same IRQ, but the device drivers sharing that 
IRQ need to know about this, and need to be able to determine which board 
(or port on the board) caused the interrupt. 
     
Jerry Feldman
Contractor, eInfrastructure Partner Engineering 
508-467-4315
Compaq Computer Corp.
200 Forest Street MRO1-3/F1
Marlboro, Ma. 01752
     
     
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pfarrar at learningco.com [SMTP:pfarrar at learningco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 1:03 PM
> To:   discuss at Blu.Org
> Subject:      choosing base addresses on NICs 
> 
>      Hi,
>      
>      I've never been clear on the base address thing.  And I've spoken 
> with 
>      a few others who seemed equally uncertain.  So on all of our 
> behalves, 
>      I am posing the following questions.  Any insight would be greatly 
>      appreciated:
>      
>      I have 2 3c509B NICs.  Each has 3 connectors TP, coax and a 9(?)PIN. 
> 
>      I need to use the DOS software to configure these to use TP.  No 
>      problem.  But I want to put them both in the same box (for the usual 
>      reason).  So I have to consider IRQ and Base address (I can find the 
>      free IRQs easily enough in /proc/interrupts).  
>      
>      What rational goes into choosing another IRQ/Base Address pair for 
> the 
>      second card?  Most cards seem to default to IRQ 10 and 0x300.  Is 
>      there a normal relationship between the IRQ and Base address (like 
>      serial ports and IRQs have)?  Or can I just use any free IRQ/address 
>      combination?  
>      
>      My assumption is that 0x300 is the START of an address range.  How 
>      large is the range?  
>      
>      How does the three byte 0xNNN addressing form relate to the addresses 
> 
>      presented in /proc/ioports?  My Linux machines are at home, but my 
>      memory is that the file lists ranges using four byte address names. 
>      
>      Also, what is 'full duplex' and do I want it enabled? 
>      
>      TIA,
>      Peter
> -
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
> message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored). 
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with 
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the 
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from ns.learningco.com ([198.112.0.7]) by mail.learningco.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.12) id 0000A05C; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:42:50 -0500
Received: by ns.learningco.com; id NAA22088; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:44:12 -0500
(EST)
Received: from tarnhelm.blu.org(207.31.228.20) by ns.learningco.com via smap
(V5.0)
	id xma022076; Mon, 27 Dec 99 13:43:59 -0500
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA11149
	for discuss-outgoing; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:26:33 -0500
Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (zmamail01.zma.compaq.com
[161.114.64.101])
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA11146
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:26:31 -0500
Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id 4C1FE24A; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:26:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net (exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net
[16.103.129.42])
	by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F79C314
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:26:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: by exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21)
	id <Y5X5V5YZ>; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:26:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CB2C0161F36AD21188E80000F881B56C05247FF8 at mroexc1.tay.dec.com>
From: "Feldman, Gerry" <Gerry.Feldman at compaq.com>
To: "'discuss at blu.org'" <discuss at Blu.Org>
Subject: RE: choosing base addresses on NICs
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:25:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-discuss at blu.org
Precedence: bulk