Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 03 May 2003 12:16:00 -0400 "David J. C. Beach" <beach at verinet.com> wrote: > After reading this article, it is my personal feeling that the Linux > community should sue SCO for slander. That would force SCO to either > admit to the wrongdoing (essentially admitting that what they printed > was false), or to prove that its IP allegations are, in fact, true. > In order for SCO to demonstrate the validity of its IP claims, it > would be forced to reveal publicly what portions of the Linux source > code were"stolen". They will have their chance. But, IBM could very well buy SCO just to get rid of the suit :-) -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030503/c91f0b10/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |