Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/25/07, Samuel Baldwin <shardz4217-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Hmm.. you picked the least supported of the 3 big BSDs (Free, Net > Open), on AMD64... I picked the most secure BSD :-) > Anyways did you check the OpenBSD ports? Yes, I have the amd64 ports installed... > "If a given package does not exist for your architecture, you may > still be able to compile the port. Besides, some users will want to > compile everything from source for various reasons." > ~OpenBSD site. > I haven't really messed with the ports system (which I should..), but > you should check it out. Here is a nice site to get you going if you are unfamiliar with OpenBSD... http://www.openbsd101.com/ > Although, I guess since the opensource one doesn't work too well > (apparently), and the closed source one is the problem, this might not > help too much, but it might be worth a shot. Best of luck. I googled around. Seems FreeBSD users have complained as well, and that possibly OpenBSD has not implemented some kernel features that need to be present in order for the driver to be supported by nvidia. The thread on freebsdforums makes this pretty clear, even up to recent posts. So I guess I am S.O.L. Damn closed-source binary drivers!!! -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |