Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:02:28, John Chambers <[hidden email]> wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: > | No, the C Standard does not specify that a stack is required, but it > | defines the behavior. So, the implementation must behave this way.=20 > > It is sorta difficult to imagine how recursion might be implemented > without something isomorphic to a stack. If someone claims they've > done it, I'd just ask what they called the stack if not "stack". ;-) > > (The obvious answers are words like "list" or "vector". But if items > are added and deleted from such structures only at one end, then you > have a stack under a different name.)
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |