Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:13 -0500, [hidden email] wrote: > Your post sort of states why I think this would be > [fun|good|useful|educational] > > Everyone has a benchmark and for some reason it never really compares > apples to apples and oranges to oranges. There is always some aspect of it > that isn't coherent. > > I think a "real life" benchmark that can be (is) run against MySQL and > PostgreSQL on the same machines, and not just the huge power servers, but > the conservative median servers that are used in development and small to > medium companies would be useful for a lot of people. > > The problem with TPC is that, last I recall, MySQL did not support enough > of the SQL standard to implement it. > > Lastly there is an amount of real experience that is gained by doing this > sort of thing on your own. It is one thing to read the results of someone > else's benchmark, but it is quite another thing to be writing/performing > the benchmark and seeing the effects on your own and really equating the > nature of the test and results. Having the chance to tune the queries for > better results and seeing the effect of different query strategies. > Professionally, I have not benchmarked MySQL in a few years and I'm going > to do it for my own edification. It would be cool if more people can get > involved and make it a broader and more comprehensive test.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |