Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Apparently there was a bug in Anaconda that was fixed, but which=20 required a complete new testing cycle. After reading the description, I=20 fully agree with the Fedora team. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-May/msg00011.ht= ml I've been involved with software a long time, and why we were a bit=20 miffed that Fedora did not accommodate our installfest, it is sometimes=20 better to slip a release a bit and fix a critical problem. Everyone=20 ships with a certain number of known bugs, but there is always a=20 judgment call whether the bug is serious enough to delay a release=20 rather than provide a patch. --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |