Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
The part I consider most important is the automated part. If the process is manual, then it won't be followed reliably. On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jerry Feldman<gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> wrote: > On 06/06/2009 02:41 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: >> >> Ultimately, it depends on monitoring. ?If you have a mechanism that ?will >> alert you to a fault then mirroring is fine. ?If you do not then ?you're >> probably better off keeping things as they are and using a ?chunk of the 1TB >> disk for regular, automated backups that do notify ?you if there is a fault. >> > > I check my nightly backup logs frequentl;y. I back up to a USB device which > has the additional feature of being portable. In the case of a lightning > strike, all 3 drives will have been cremated :-) > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> > Boston Linux and Unix > PGP key id: 537C5846 > PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB ?CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |