BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:41:29 -0400
- In-reply-to: <li6sijy84u4.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
- References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <20140911113221.GE13278@randomstring.org> <5411AADE.2020302@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3XN6MdTz6qEs=xcxKegZSf4beEZ_GFVAOuCDHZ3PnPN7w@mail.gmail.com> <li6zje687ex.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <CAAbKA3UHOok2F+trqSKvvSjzmMTVmhUcuXzmqHsDL3tfJisoSg@mail.gmail.com> <li6sijy84u4.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Mike Small <smallm at panix.com> wrote: > This is kind of what I think the systemd soap opera is at least partly > about, this split of user category. That's certainly part of it, but I'm hearing SysAdmins are divided on SystemD's replace-all-the-things mission-creep too. Maybe more later ... -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):
