BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Subject: [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:53:54 -0400
- In-reply-to: <f070345fbc8df1abfeddbb78256b1256.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
- References: <6fa7ee51-5b2a-5b68-e016-41d4ec5f0d6a@borg.org> <20220728164030.wkrf6wbhrzwfkpnw@randomstring.org> <2f102d1e-ffd3-b25f-89c8-634a8fd916ed@borg.org> <20220728172328.fxtxe7ez77ywk7hy@randomstring.org> <6735affcf739a1c41cd8eb51dfb8486a.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <20220728192442.qbuhzostabhsoyau@randomstring.org> <f37eb1b232361f3afbc6d3f9619275d2.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <20220728204051.vqmqribxxokpjhbe@randomstring.org> <ae76e819e87117b56a7a2b67d35fa5d7.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <20220729084635.18cdd112.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <f070345fbc8df1abfeddbb78256b1256.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:06:03 -0400 markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > High availability is a fairly specialized deployment and that is > accomplished with many different strategies. KVM has provisions for > redundant high availability. You can create two servers that have > access to the same LUNs (or us something like drbd) But as I said: you can't do this with a single VM host. When you start expanding your virtualization infrastructure you can rack up some very high initial costs. Let's say for example you have an old machine with 4 cores and 8GB RAM which I think is reasonable given your previous suggestion. And lets say you want 4 VMs with 2 cores and 2GB each (equivalent to a smallish Pi4). Well, you can't fit them all on just that one host so you need two hosts. But you still don't have HA because if one VM server fails, or is restarted for routine maintenance, you don't have enough capacity for all of your VMs so you really need at least three VM servers to provide sufficient capacity and fault tolerance. Maybe these costs are worth it (as they certainly are for my employer) but for a private network? A Pi cluster may be a better and more cost effective solution than virtualization. And the Pi cluster is probably the more fun project. YMMV. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- References:
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] ZFS on Raspberry Pi?
- Index(es):