Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/9/07, Ted Roche <tedroche-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > I learned in the days of selling Amigas that the technically superior > solution wasn't always the winner in the horse race :) I agree and have seen this from many sides, including externally as a consumer, and also internally as a developer. Microsoft is still the winner, but the "technical" aspect is debatable. Microsoft has way too much money. Why can't we all rise up and replace the giant with Linux on both the servers and desktops? Why don't we jazz up the Ubuntu slickness, start selling an Ubuntu-variant for $2500 per license, and then call it Enterprise Ready? The main infrastructure component holding back Linux in large corporations, from what I have seen, are Active Directory and Shared Calendaring. This is what executives want. If they cannot do shared calendaring, the game is over. Zimbra may solve this. But people still want Active Directory also. Can we brainstorm towards a solution? I don't think we will find it the first time, but start the discussion and let's see where it ends up... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |