Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/07/2009 02:54 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > I think a lot of it had to do with the fact that SCO didn't sell =20 > hardware. Every other commercial UNIX vendor of the period, circa =20 > 1990, was a hardware vendor. SCO only sold the OS licenses. That is a = =20 > big draw in the semi-custom POS market. > =20 SCO was not the only Unix software vendor. Microsoft actually developed=20 Xenix before selling it to SCO. Certainly, most were hardware companies, = but there were a few other Unix vendors the used PC hardware. I recall=20 Venix in the 1980s, but there were some more, and a couple of Unix-like, = such as Minix and Coherent, and QNX.=20 --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |