Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Full disk encryption



> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Chris O'Connell
> 
> ALSO, NO FULL DISK ENCRYPTION should ever be used on an SSD drive.
>  Performance will drop by 30% and the drive's wear-leveling system and
> TRIM
> won't function correctly.

First of all, the supposed 30% performance hit takes you down from 200% to
170% performance as compared to an HDD (or whatever arbitrary numbers we
want to make up for comparing HDD vs SSD performance where SSD performance >
HDD performance).

Second of all, some OSes support TRIM on encrypted drives.  They just reduce
the size of disk they consume by some percentage, and TRIM the unused blocks
as necessary, so there are always some blocks available for use that have
been TRIM'd.

Third of all, some SSD's support the virtual size reduction as above, but do
it at the hardware level, so there are always TRIM'd blocks available.

In any of the above scenarios, the end result is no significant performance
degradation on SSD's caused by TRIM vs Encryption.




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org