BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Subject: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:37:09 -0400
- In-reply-to: <535813B2.5030401@gmail.com> (Richard Pieri's message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:25:38 -0400")
- References: <20140423174046.GP3247@dragontoe.org> <53580798.6040309@gmail.com> <li6zjjbyi3c.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <535813B2.5030401@gmail.com>
Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> writes: >> I would have thought the world doesn't trust OpenSSL much at all at this >> exact moment, though perhaps it trusts that one module, maybe, well >> except the openbsd people not so much: > > Yes, well, the Heartbleed stupid isn't in the certified module and it > is one of the most spectacular security failures ever. So this is kind of what troubles me in the line this thread has taken re. checking that the encryption algorithms are well chosen and implemented correctly. In terms of the security of a system that seems analogous to checking my data processing application is ready to go by checking that it uses red/black trees, that its stable_sort sorts right and that its hash tables use good hash functions. You'd want all that, but it's just a beginning.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- References:
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Index(es):